VZMD has been very seriously pointing out that to a long series of already known and disclosed facts, which expressly prove the lies in the claims made by the Bank of Slovenia, Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Slovenia and the Government of the Republic of Slovenia on the necessity of expropriations of shareholders and holders of hybrid and subordinated bonds of NLB, NKBM, Abanka, Banka Celje, Probanka and Factor banka, this type of new facts have been constantly attached.
Over the last few months, VZMD has - following the publication of results of the stress test of the European Central Bank (ECB) which NLB and NKBM failed, which, according to the claims of the Bank of Slovenia, was supposed to be the "proof" of the necessity of the expropriation of their private owners and subordinate creditors one year before - cautioned to extremely unrealistic pessimistic assumptions and forecasts applied in the tests of the two banks. Now that NLB and NKBM have published their revised annual reports for 2014, it has been become indisputably provable that it was not only forecasts of macroeconomic indicators that were downright unrealistic, but also the forecasts of capital adequacy of banks! In order for banks to pass or fail a stress test, it was pivotal for the ECB to use forecasts of the movements in the common equity tier ratio (CET1) of a bank, and to what extent the actual value (acknowledged by auditors) of CET1 at NLB and NKBM exceeds the forecast applied in the stress test, is summarized in the following table:
At the same time, April was the month of repeated corroboration of the fact, which was frequently pointed out by VZMD, whereby at the request of the European Commission (EC), also after August 2013, according to claims of the Banks of Slovenia, Ministry of Finance and Government of the Republic of Slovenia the cancellation of shares and subordinated bonds was supposedly a necessary prerequisite for the state-aided recapitalization of a bank, that EC has never required such cancellation from other countries and will not do so in the future
VZMD has been repeatedly pointing out, that EC had never required any intervention regarding subordinated bonds when on September 3, 2013, the Republic of Austria was issued a permission for the state aidto the Hypo Group Alpe Adria bank (http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-811_en.htm), neither did it do so on November 27, 2013, when the Republic of Italy was issued a permission for the state aid to the Monte dei Paschi di Siena bank (http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-1174_en.htm). Nevertheless, VZMD is now also cautioning that EC did not require so either on April 9 this year, when the Republic of Ireland was issued a permission for the state aid to the Permanent TSB bank (http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-4755_en.htm); as this bank's shares continue to be traded with (http://markets.ft.com/research/Markets/Tearsheets/Summary?s=ILB:ISE) as well as their subordinated bonds (www.ise.ie/Market-Data-Announcements/Debt/Individual-Debt-Instrument-Data/ShowSecTranche/?refNo=3931&trancheID=55536).
Therefore, VZMD would like to call upon the Bank of Slovenia, Ministry of Finance and the Government of the Republic of Slovenia again to hold back misleading and obscuring practices and to publicly state that the empirical evidence and the actual state of affairs already a while ago unequivocally proved the uniqueness of the measures of expropriation of shareholders and holders of hybrid and subordinated bonds conducted in NLB, NKBM, Abanka, Banka Celje, Probanka and Factor banka, and to enter into a constructive dialogue with all aggrieved parties
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT - VZMD also lodged a proposal for the temporary decree for PROHIBITING THE SALE OF Nova KBM bank - to prevent direct damage to the Republic of Slovenia and its citizens
STRESS TESTS – new and obvious proof of the extremely unequal adjudication of Slovenian banks – are they guilty in Brussels or Ljubljana, and what are their motives? The PanSlovenian Shareholders' Association (VZMD) has called on the Bank of Slovenia (BA) and the European Central Bank (ECB) to explain, why only in Slovenia are we left to use »static« and extremely pessimistic assumptions, while in other countries and banks of the EU fresh data and »dynamic« valuations are used and even allow for